Understand what informed consent is in the context of medical malpractice law.
Informed consent refers to a doctor’s legal responsibility to inform patients of the risks of a medical procedure. Almost all medical procedures carry at least minor risks. Many of these procedures are valid and necessary, despite the small chance of harm or complications. But a doctor still must go over the risks with the patient, allowing the patient to factor them into their decision on whether to move forward with the procedure.
If your doctor did not inform you of the risks of a medical procedure and you suffered harm or complications from the procedure, you may have grounds for a medical malpractice lawsuit even if your injury resulted from normal risk and not because of negligence by the doctor. Call 888-261-5614 today for a free case evaluation with the Newsome | Melton law firm.
The Requirements of Informed Consent
Informed consent is based on the idea that patients deserve to be informed of any significant risks before they consent to a medical procedure. The law puts the burden on doctors to make sure their patients understand these potential complications.
When your doctor has you sign a form stating you understand the risks of a procedure, it is because he is trying to remain compliant with the informed consent law. Just because you signed a waiver does not mean, though, that you signed away your right to recover damages if something goes wrong. Informed consent requires a doctor to do more than just elicit a signature from the patient.
If your doctor did not explain the risks of a procedure in detail, making sure you understood each one before moving onto the next, you could have grounds for a malpractice suit even if you signed a form consenting to the procedure. A lawyer can help you build your case.
How to Show a Doctor Violated Informed Consent
In a medical malpractice lawsuit, a doctor is judged to have violated informed consent if the following conditions are present:
- A reasonable doctor in the same situation would have disclosed the risk
- The risk was significant enough that you, the patient, may have opted not to consent to the procedure had you known about it.
Your medical malpractice lawyer can bring in expert witnesses to play the role of a reasonable person. These experts will be medical professionals who can review the evidence and testify about whether they would have gone over the risks that your doctor skipped.
Your lawyer also can bring up alternatives to the procedure that you may have chosen if your doctor had informed you of the risks. This can strengthen the claim that you would have made a different decision had you possessed the right knowledge.
When Informed Consent Does Not Apply
In rare circumstances, doctors are exempt from some of the provisions of informed consent. To give an example, when a patient gets wheeled in who may die quickly without emergency intervention, the doctor is not expected to review the risks of a potentially lifesaving procedure calmly.
To Receive a Free Medical Malpractice Case Evaluation, Call Newsome | Melton at 888-526-8947
The Newsome | Melton legal team wants to help you with your medical malpractice claim. For a free consultation and case evaluation, call 888-526-8947 today.
Informed Consent - Frequently Asked Questions
The exact numbers of cases of locked-in syndrome are difficult to find in medical literature, but many consider it a rare condition. A typical person is likely to live his or her entire life without ever meeting or knowing anyone with locked-in syndrome. But for the small percentage of people who develop it, locked-in syndrome
Read More
Absent exceptional circumstances, a medical malpractice case cannot be reopened after it has settled. Once you have signed the settlement documents—including the release—and received your check, your claim usually closes. You cannot go back and ask for more money, even if your case was worth more than you received. An attorney from Newsome | Melton can
Read MoreInformed Consent - News Articles
2013 Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Settled; Chicago Heights Six years ago, Nyelle Brown was born in a Chicago Heights hospital. Her delivery was at first a routine one, but after being administered Pitocin—a drug that induces labor and contractions—both child and mother began to experience significant distress. Instead of opting for a cesarean section, the staff,
Read More
On February 29, 2016, Andrew J. Martin, then 70 years old, was brought into the Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, located in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. Margaret Martin, his wife, and their three children, were under the impression that he would be quickly returning from the hospital in good health. But after spending 77 days at the
Read More