
Asbestosis is a lung disease caused by inhaling asbestos fibers. Asbestos is a mineral that was once common in the construction of houses, apartments, and office buildings. It was a feature of insulation and of floor and ceiling tiles. Before its dangers were well-known, workers, particularly in the building and construction trades, frequently came into contact with asbestos on the job. Many of these workers later developed asbestosis and other lung conditions.
Asbestosis is dangerous because it can lead to pulmonary fibrosis (the scarring of lung tissue) and mesothelioma (a deadly lung cancer associated with asbestos exposure). It relates to medical malpractice in that your doctor has a professional duty to make an accurate and timely diagnosis when you present symptoms of asbestosis. An erroneous or delayed diagnosis can cause you to experience complications you otherwise could have avoided.
The Symptoms of Asbestosis
If you visited your doctor complaining of certain symptoms, your doctor should have recognized asbestosis as a possibility, especially if you worked in the construction trade before modern regulations limited workers’ exposure to the substance. A diligent doctor would know this information, as he or she would have taken your complete history and carefully reviewed it.
Here are the most common symptoms of asbestosis:
- Shortness of breath
- Persistent, dry cough
- Loss of appetite
- Weight loss
- Widening of the fingertips or toes (“clubbing”)
- Chest tightness or pain
If you presented one or more of these symptoms to your doctor, and he or she did not test for asbestosis despite your history of coming into contact with asbestos, this failure may constitute negligence.
Risk Factors for Developing Asbestosis
Even before you described your symptoms to your doctor, he or she should have asked about your medical and work history. This information can provide insight into the origins of a patient’s maladies.
In the case of asbestosis, the risk factors involve occupations. If your work history includes any of the following roles, your doctor should have been vigilant about screening for asbestosis:
- Asbestos mining
- Asbestos removal
- Aircraft and auto mechanic
- Boiler operation
- Construction work
- Electrical work
- Railroad work
- Shipyard work
If your doctor knew you worked in any of these positions and did not think to screen for asbestosis, or if he or she never bothered to ask about your work history when evaluating you, then his or her actions may have been negligent, giving you grounds to file a medical malpractice lawsuit.
For Help with a Medical Malpractice Case for Asbestosis, Call Newsome | Melton at 888-261-5614
The Newsome | Melton medical malpractice team can help you seek damages from your doctor for his or her failure to diagnose asbestosis. We offer a free consultation and work on a no-win-no-fee basis. To speak with a member of our staff today, call us at 888-261-5614.
Asbestosis - Frequently Asked Questions
Locked-in syndrome is a rare neurological condition in which a patient is incapable of voluntary movement but usually has full cognitive awareness. It is unlikely that a locked-in syndrome patient with total paralysis would feel physical pain. It may be possible for someone with an incomplete version to feel a pinprick or pinch. In general,
Read More
If you, your loved one, or your child suffered injuries during a medical procedure in Florida, you might be eligible for compensation—even if no malpractice occurred. Florida’s patient compensation funds provide money for specific injuries. If you are eligible for one of these funds, you could get paid without having to file for medical malpractice.
Read MoreAsbestosis - News Articles
After nine months of waiting, Angela Marchant went into labor on July 22, 2016. She was rushed into the St. Charles Family Birthing Center, located in Bend, Oregon. The center is operated by the St. Charles Health System, which is one of the largest providers of medical care in the state of Oregon. According to
Read More
Last week, Florida’s House of Representatives approved a business-backed bill that will shift the state’s test for the admissibility of expert witness testimony from the Frye standard to the Daubert standard. Approximately 28 other states and the federal courts use this tougher standard, which critics say would pose a challenge for patients who pursue medical
Read More