In a medical setting, the duty of care refers to a doctor’s responsibility to their patients. Any actions that do not uphold this duty of care are generally considered negligent. When negligence leads to adverse outcomes for a patient, the doctor can be liable for any damages that result.
A doctor’s failure to uphold the duty of care can give rise to a medical malpractice claim, especially if the patient can prove that the doctor’s failure led to injury or other economic or non-economic harm. For help understanding duty of care and medical malpractice law, contact Medical Malpractice Help today. Our attorneys offer free case evaluations to victims of medical negligence across the U.S. Call 888-261-5614 today.
How to Establish a Duty of Care
A doctor owes a duty of care to a patient when a doctor-patient relationship exists between them. If a person asks for and receives advice about an ankle sprain from a random doctor in an elevator, no duty of care governs that exchange, as the advice was not given within the context of a doctor-patient relationship.
A doctor-patient relationship is established when a patient voluntarily seeks treatment from a particular doctor and enters into an agreement to receive care from that physician. If any of the following facts are true, there was likely a doctor-patient relationship—and thus a duty of care—in the case:
- The patient voluntary selected the doctor for treatment.
- The patient submitted to treatment, care, or examinations by the doctor to address an ailment or medical condition.
- The patient’s treatment by the doctor was ongoing.
A doctor’s duty of care to a patient covers the time during which the relationship existed. If either party terminates the relationship at any point, the doctor does not have a duty of care toward the patient any longer. This is why it is critical for patients to retain all records from their various doctors in case they ever need to prove that a doctor-patient relationship existed.
How to Determine If a Doctor Violated the Duty of Care
To qualify as medical malpractice, the plaintiff must show the doctor breached their duty and violated the standard of care. Proving a violation requires showing that the doctor’s actions—or lack of action—failed to uphold the “reasonable person” standard.
The Reasonable Person Standard
The reasonable person standard compares the doctor’s behavior to what we would expect from another doctor faced with the same situation.
For example, imagine a patient goes to the doctor for persistent abdominal pain. The patient’s condition turns out to be appendix cancer. However, the patient does not discover this until months later, as the initial doctor misdiagnosed the appendix cancer. If another doctor would have correctly diagnosed the cancer and started treatment, the defendant likely violated their duty of care.
Call 888-261-5614 to Schedule a Free Case Evaluation With a Medical Malpractice Lawyer
If you believe your doctor breached their duty of care to you, the legal team at Medical Malpractice Help wants to help you pursue the compensation you deserve for your damages. Our medical malpractice lawyers offer free initial consultations and case evaluations. To schedule an appointment, call our office at 888-261-5614.
Duty Of Care - Frequently Asked Questions
In most medical malpractice cases, the term “standard of care” plays a significant role. Success hinges on whether the claimant can prove a “breach of the standard of care” in a medical malpractice case. The job of the patient’s attorney is to prove that the health care provider had a standard of care to the patient
Read MoreIf I Was the Victim of Medical Negligence, How Long Do I Have to File a Malpractice Lawsuit? If you suffered injuries because of the negligent actions of a doctor or medical provider, you could be eligible to file for medical malpractice and recover compensation for your damages. However, you have a limited time to make
Read MoreDuty Of Care - News Articles
In August 2010, Joann Shull Bannister and her husband were told by Dr. Philip Kinder that his team at Columbia Urological Associates were planning on surgically removing a lesion from her left kidney. The Bannisters were relieved when it was determined shortly thereafter that the surgery was unnecessary. According to a medical malpractice lawsuit, filed
Read MoreOn April 9, 2008 Monica Broughton consented to her doctor’s recommendation that they induce labor. Broughton had just learned that she had developed diabetes during her pregnancy. She had also recently been told that her unborn son’s shoulder was stuck behind her pelvis. She never considered an alternative, especially because, according to the lawsuit, Wong
Read More